Exploring Bidirectional Protective Devices

With the rise of alternative energy sources like solar photovoltaic (PV) and energy storage systems, bidirectional power flow has become a crucial consideration for certain protective devices. This guide delves into the selection and installation of protective devices for such sources, as outlined in the recently issued BEAMA bulletin on connecting unidirectional and bidirectional protective devices.

Understanding Unidirectional Protective Devices

Unidirectional protective devices are specifically designed to accommodate power flow in a single direction, typically from the supply to the load. These devices are marked to distinguish between line and load terminals, ensuring correct connection. Examples include single-module residual current breakers with over-current protection (RCBOs) and arc fault detection devices (AFDDs), commonly employing electronic circuits for residual current protection. It's essential to adhere to the manufacturer's connection instructions to ensure proper functionality.

Bidirectional Protective Devices Explained

In contrast, bidirectional protective devices lack markings indicating line and load terminals, making them suitable for power flow in either direction without risk of damage. For instance, traditional electromechanical residual current circuit-breakers (RCCBs) and electronic RCCBs are bidirectional, often not labeled for line or load connections.

Identification and Usage of Protective Devices

Protective devices like miniature circuit-breakers (MCBs), RCCBs, RCBOs, and AFDDs feature markings to differentiate between supply and load terminals, typically indicated by labels like "line" and "load" or directional arrows. However, it's crucial to consult the manufacturer to confirm bidirectional compatibility, especially for devices without explicit markings.


Implications for Existing Installations

When assessing existing installations, such as during electrical installation condition reports (EICRs), it's vital to consider device functionality in case of failure. For TT systems, RCD failure poses safety concerns and warrants immediate attention. Recommendations for improvement align with current standards, but judgment should consider individual circumstances.


In conclusion, bidirectional power flow necessitates careful selection of protective devices for generators and energy storage systems. While RCDs may not be obligatory for PV systems, their application should align with installation requirements and manufacturer guidelines. Selecting the appropriate RCD type and ensuring bidirectional compatibility are critical aspects to consider, emphasizing adherence to manufacturer instructions for optimal device performance.

Subscribe to our emails

Be the first to know about new products and exclusive offers.